Jesus fucking christ I don't know why simply having an opinion on how a story is going has been this overblown, and I've literally had points taken off because of a title by a professor. The story will come back to "The Internship" part of it, all the other plot elements will be addressed, more plot elements will be added, just like any other literary piece. I am assuming you are not a patron, so just like everyone, you have to wait, soak it in as it's posted here and enjoy it for what it is.
"False advertising is the use of false, misleading, or unproven information to advertise products to consumers or advertising that does not disclose its source." In no way, shape or form, the title or the story are false advertising. Furthermore considering how many volumes the story has. YOu don't have to mention it in every, single, possible, line of the comic. "The Internship" is still the important part of the story. It's the center part of how Andy decided to try and move on from his crush on Cooper, but things ended up not going his way, and are developing into what he was trying to move away from. "The Internship" is still related to the story: Titles are always, 100% relevant to the story, but they are, in no way, shape or form, supposed to be what you are trying to say it should be. The story doesn't focus on mice at all, and one of the characters that make up for most of the plot is Curley's Wife - not a man. "Of Mice And Men" is still a relevant example, because it's a Metaphor as a title. Was there, at any point of the story, one guy that was definitely a lord and was the lord of all rings or of many rings? Because the story is not based on "the rings", but yes on the crusade that two hobbits face in order to get rid of the last piece of an evil presence, which is *a* ring, not "many"/"several" rings. "Lord of The Rings" is another perfect example. I've written many, many essays with metaphors, seemingly unrelated alliterations, hyperboles and whatnot and I have never had any points taken off of my essays. Titles are illustrative and sometimes not even allusive to the subject. How is it "irrelevant"? Just because you're getting 1 page per week and it isn't about Andy being at his internship 100% of the time, it doesn't make the title "false advertisement", what are you even talking about?Ī college professor will mark points off an essay because of an "irrelevant title"? Unlikely, unless the essay has nothing to do with the theme you were told to write. If it was just a comic about just his internship, it'd be fucking boring. Its a story about Andy and his internship to a career path, and the choices he makes along the way. Its not false advertising, you are using that term incorrectly.
In the next parts of the comic the story will return to Andy at his internship, only now he has the baggage of these events which we are witnessing, otherwise the story simply stagnates. Cooper has to deal with the consequence from what he started, Andy has to deal with the consequence of his reciprocation, it could be a choice between letting emeray down, letting cooper down, or possibly losing them both if keeping both does not become an option.
We are on the path after cooper kissed Andy that lead Andy to kiss cooper back, had he not done that, the story would have taken a totally different route this is the consequence of that action, and the knock on effect will be the fork in the road for Andy and cooper when they have to make a choice.
Every action in life has a consequence, and every consequence has an effect.